Category Archives: Catholic clergy

Christmas greetings to Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops and Directors of the Governorate of Vatican City State (December 20, 2010)

Sex Abuse: How does the Church select its seminarians?

El Papa pide perdón… otra vez, como en julio de 2008 (en 1.001 palabras)

El semanario Time publicó el 7 de junio de 2010 el reportaje Why being Pope Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry, que ponía en cuestión la capacidad de Benedicto XVI de pedir perdón por los casos de abusos sexuales que han aparecido a la luz pública en los últimos meses.

El viernes 11 de junio, en la clausura del Año Sacerdotal, Benedicto XVI ha afirmado: “Era de esperar que al «enemigo» no le gustara que el sacerdocio brillara de nuevo; él hubiera preferido verlo desaparecer, para que al fin Dios fuera arrojado del mundo. Y así ha ocurrido que, precisamente en este año de alegría por el sacramento del sacerdocio, han salido a la luz los pecados de los sacerdotes, sobre todo el abuso a los pequeños, en el cual el sacerdocio, que lleva a cabo la solicitud de Dios por el bien del hombre, se convierte en lo contrario. También nosotros pedimos perdón insistentemente a Dios y a las personas afectadas, mientras prometemos que queremos hacer todo lo posible para que semejante abuso no vuelva a suceder jamás; que en la admisión al ministerio sacerdotal y en la formación que prepara al mismo haremos todo lo posible para examinar la autenticidad de la vocación; y que queremos acompañar aún más a los sacerdotes en su camino, para que el Señor los proteja y los custodie en las situaciones dolorosas y en los peligros de la vida”.

Algunos observadores han visto aquí la respuesta a esta exigencia de arrepentimiento: Benedicto XVI pide ‘perdón’ por primera vez por el escándalo de abusos sexuales a menores (El Mundo). Público: “Benedicto XVI pide al fin perdón a las víctimas de abusos sexuales”.

¿Es realmente la primera vez que Benedicto XVI pide perdón? El País, de hecho, destacaba como novedoso el énfasis de la petición: El Papa pide “insistentemente perdón” a Dios y a las víctimas de los abusos. New York Times, periódico que lanzó las primeras informaciones, titulaba Pope Pleads for Forgiveness Over Abuse Scandal, añadiendo el matiz de que “It was the first time that Pope Benedict XVI had commented on the scandal from St. Peter’s Basilica”.

Tal matiz tiene su razón de ser. De hecho, no todos los medios han considerado las palabras del Papa como la primera petición de perdón. Así, por ejemplo, La Vanguardia recogía en su web el texto de EFE, que valoraba el carácter público de esta petición. El ABC ni siquiera hablaba de pedir perdón, y encabezaba la noticia explicando que “Benedicto XVI prometió hacer todo lo posible para que los abusos sexuales no vuelvan a suceder jamás” y que “lanzó también un serio aviso a los obispos encubridores o cobardes: No es amor tolerar comportamientos indignos de la vida sacerdotal”.

Como algún blog periodístico ya ha señalado, lo cierto es efectivamente no es la primera vez que el Papa pide perdón y expresa su cercanía a las víctimas.

En la carta a los católicos de Irlanda (19/3/10), afirmó estar “profundamente consternado”, compartir con las víctimas “la desazón y el sentimiento de traición” y sentir “abiertamente la vergüenza y el remordimiento”. Pope Benedict tells victims “I am truly sorry”, resumía un periodista de la BBC. ‘I am truly sorry’: Pope Benedict apologises for decades of child abuse in Irish Catholic Church, afirmaba Daily Mail. Al-Jazeera: Pope ‘truly sorry’ over Irish abuse. En la misma línea Belfast Telegraph, entre otros. La expresión inglesa I’m truly sorry fue traducida al castellano como me apesadumbra en verdad, que no recoge con la misma exactitud el acto de pedir perdón. Aún así, algunos medios en español interpretaron las palabras en el mismo sentido que los ingleses. El Mundo refería en su web el día 22, citando a EFE, y el día 24, citando a Reuters, que en la carta el Papa “pidió perdón a las víctimas de los curas pederastas”. Igual otros como ABC, TVE o La Tercera de Chile.

Pero la demostración más clara de que Benedicto XVI pedía perdón a las víctimas ya pudo comprobarse un lejano 12 de julio de 2008, durante el trayecto en avión hacia Australia. A la pregunta: “¿hablará de la cuestión de los abusos sexuales y pedirá perdón?” respondió un rotundo “sí”, y luego el Papa explicó sus razones concluyendo con el significado que, a su entender, tiene la expresión pedir perdón: “haremos todo lo posible para dejar claro cuál es la enseñanza de la Iglesia y para ayudar en la educación, en la preparación de los sacerdotes, en la formación permanente; haremos todo lo posible para curar y reconciliar a las víctimas. Creo que este es el contenido fundamental de la expresión “pedir perdón”. Creo que es mejor y más importante dar el contenido de la fórmula y creo que el contenido debe explicar en qué ha fallado nuestro comportamiento, qué debemos hacer en este momento, cómo podemos prevenir y cómo podemos todos sanar y reconciliar”. ¿Qué ha hecho sino, Benedicto XVI, desde entonces?

Era el sábado 12 de julio de 2008. Por un mes y un día, casi dos años antes de la supuesta primera petición de perdón del día 11 de junio de 2010.

Ya en 2006, refiriéndose a Irlanda había insistido en la necesidad de “sanar a las víctimas y a todos los afectados por esos crímenes enormes”. En Australia, durante el mencionado viaje de 2008, dijo: “Estoy muy apenado por el dolor y el sufrimiento que han padecido las víctimas, y les aseguro que, como su pastor, también comparto su sufrimiento. Estos delitos, que constituyen una grave traición a la confianza, deben ser condenados de modo inequívoco. Han provocado gran dolor y han dañado el testimonio de la Iglesia. Os pido a todos que apoyéis y ayudéis a vuestros obispos, y que colaboréis con ellos en combatir este mal. Las víctimas deben recibir compasión y asistencia, y los responsables de estos males deben ser llevados ante la justicia”. Como había hecho ya poco tiempo antes en Estados Unidos, Benedicto XVI compartió las penas de un grupo de víctimas.

Marc Argemí

https://bxvi.wordpress.com

Apostolic Visitation of Ireland to begin this autumn

2 Replies

((noticia en castellano)) ((notícia en català)) ((vídeos))

Source: http://visnews-en.blogspot.com/2010/05/apostolic-visitation-of-ireland-to.html

VATICAN CITY, 31 MAY 2010 (VIS) – This morning the Holy See Press Office released the following English-language communique concerning the apostolic visitation of Ireland as announced in the Holy Father’s 19 March Letter to the Catholics of Ireland:

“Following the Holy Father’s Letter to the Catholics of Ireland, the apostolic visitation of certain Irish dioceses, seminaries and religious congregations will begin in autumn of this year.

“Through this visitation, the Holy See intends to offer assistance to the bishops, clergy, religious and lay faithful as they seek to respond adequately to the situation caused by the tragic cases of abuse perpetrated by priests and religious upon minors. It is also intended to contribute to the desired spiritual and moral renewal that is already being vigorously pursued by the Church in Ireland.

“The apostolic visitors will set out to explore more deeply questions concerning the handling of cases of abuse and the assistance owed to the victims; they will monitor the effectiveness of and seek possible improvements to the current procedures for preventing abuse, taking as their points of reference the Pontifical ‘Motu Proprio’ ‘Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela’ and the norms contained in ‘Safeguarding Children: Standards and Guidance Document for the Catholic Church in Ireland’, commissioned and produced by the National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church.

“The visitation will begin in the four metropolitan archdioceses of Ireland (Armagh, Dublin, Cashel and Emly, and Tuam) and will then be extended to some other dioceses.

“The visitors named by the Holy Father for the dioceses are: Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, archbishop emeritus of Westminster, England, for the archdiocese of Armagh; Cardinal Sean Patrick O’Malley O.F.M. Cap., archbishop of Boston, U.S.A., for the archdiocese of Dublin; Archbishop Thomas Christopher Collins of Toronto, Canada, for the archdiocese of Cashel and Emly, and Archbishop Terrence Thomas Prendergast S.J. of Ottawa, Canada, for the archdiocese of Tuam.

“In its desire to accompany the process of renewal of houses of formation for the future priests of the Church in Ireland, the Congregation for Catholic Education will co-ordinate the visitation of the Irish seminaries, including the Pontifical Irish College in Rome. While special attention will be given to the matters that occasioned the apostolic visitation, in the case of the seminaries it will cover all aspects of priestly formation. Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, U.S.A., has been named apostolic visitor.

“For its part, the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life will organise the visitation of religious houses in two phases. Firstly it will conduct an enquiry by means of a questionnaire to be sent to all the superiors of religious institutes present in Ireland, with a view to providing an accurate picture of the current situation and formulating plans for the observance and improvement of the norms contained in the ‘guidelines’. In the second phase, the apostolic visitors will be: Fr. Joseph Tobin C.Ss.R. and Fr. Gero McLaughlin S.J. for institutes of men; Sr. Sharon Holland I.H.M. and Sr. Mairin McDonagh R.J.M. for institutes of women. They will carry out a careful study, evaluating the results obtained from the questionnaire and the possible steps to be taken in the future in order to usher in a season of spiritual rebirth for religious life on the Island.

“His Holiness invites all the members of the Irish Catholic community to support this fraternal initiative with their prayers. He invokes God’s blessings upon the visitors, and upon all the bishops, clergy, religious and lay faithful of Ireland, that the visitation may be for them an occasion of renewed fervour in the Christian life, and that it may deepen their faith and strengthen their hope in Christ our Saviour”.

How the Nazis engineered a paedophile priests scare

“In 1937 propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels organized a campaign to discredit the Catholic Church after Pope Pius XI severely criticised the Nazi regime.”

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/how_the_nazis_engineered_a_paedophile_priests_scare/

“There are cases of sexual abuse that come to light every day against a large number of members of the Catholic clergy. Unfortunately it’s not a matter of individual cases, but a collective moral crisis that perhaps the cultural history of humanity has never before known with such a frightening and disconcerting dimension. Numerous priests and religious have confessed. There’s no doubt that the thousands of cases which have come to the attention of the justice system represent only a small fraction of the true total, given that many molesters have been covered and hidden by the hierarchy.”

An editorial from a great secular newspaper in 2010? No: It’s a speech of May 28, 1937, by Joseph Goebbels (1897-1945), Minister of Propaganda for the Third Reich. This speech, which had a large international echo, was the apex of a campaign launched by the Nazi regime to discredit the Catholic Church by involving it in a scandal of pedophile priests.

Two hundred and seventy-six religious and forty-nine diocesan priests were arrested in 1937. The arrests took place in all the German dioceses, in order to keep the scandals on the front pages of the newspapers.

On March 10, 1937, with the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, Pope Pius XI (1857-1939) condemned the Nazi ideology. At the end of the same month, the Nazi Ministry of Propaganda headed by Goebbels launched a campaign against the sexual abuses of priests. The design and administration of this campaign are known to historians thanks to documents which tell a story worthy of the best spy novels.

In 1937, the head of the counter-espionage service of the German military was Admiral Wilhelm Canaris (1887-1945). He became gradually anti-Nazi, and at the time was maturing the convictions which led him to organize the failed assassination attempt against Hitler in 1944, following which he was hanged in 1945. Canaris disapproved of Goebbels’ maneuver against the Church, and instructed a Catholic lawyer named Josef Müller (1878-1979) to carry to Rome a series of highly secret documents on the subject.

In different phases, Müller – before he was arrested and sent to the Dachau extermination camp, where he survived, and later became the post-war Minister of Justice in Bavaria – carried the secret documents to Pius XII (1876-1958), who asked the Society of Jesus to study them.

With the approval of the Secretary of State, the study of the Nazi plot against the Church was entrusted to the German Jesuit Walter Mariaux (1894-1963), who had inspired an anti-Nazi organization in Germany called “Pauluskreis.” He was later prudently sent as a missionary in Brazil and in Argentina. There, as leader of the Marian Congregation, he exercised his influence over an entire generation of lay Catholics, among whom was the noted Brazilian Catholic thinker Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira (1908-1995), who attended his group in São Paulo. In 1940, in London in English and in Argentina in Spanish, Mariaux published two volumes on anti-Catholic persecution by the Third Reich under the pseudonym “Testis Fidelis.” They contained over seven hundred pages of documents with comments, which aroused great emotion in the entire world.

The expression “moral panic” was only coined by sociologists in the 1970s to identify a social alarm created artificially, by amplifying real facts and exaggerating their numbers through statistical folklore, as well as “discovering” and presenting as “new” events which in reality are already known and which date to the past. There are real events at the base of the panic, but their number is systematically distorted.

Even without the benefit of modern sociology, Goebbels responded to the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge in 1937 with a textbook case of the creation of a moral panic.

As always in moral panics, the facts are not totally invented. Prior to the encyclical there were some cases in Germany of abuse of minors. Mariaux himself considered a religious in the school of Bad Reichenall guilty, as well as a lay teacher, a gardener and a janitor, who were condemned in 1936, although he believed the sanction imposed by the Ministry of Public Instruction in Bavaria – revoking the authorization to run scholastic institutes of four religious orders – to be entirely disproportionate, and he linked it to the desire of the regime to undercut Catholic schools. Also in the case of the Franciscans of Waldbreitbach, in Rhineland, Mariaux was open to the hypothesis that the accused were guilty, although later historians have not excluded the possibility that they were framed by the Nazis.

The cases, which were few, but real, produced a very strong reaction from the episcopate. On June 2, 1936, the Bishop of Münster – Blessed Clemens August von Galen (1878-1946), who was the soul of Catholic resistance to Nazism, and who was beatified in 2005 by Benedict XVI – had a declaration read at all the Sunday Masses in which he expressed “pain and sadness” for these “abominable crimes” that “cover our Holy Church with ignominy.” On August 20, 1936, after the events at Waldbreitbach, the German episcopate published a joint pastoral letter in which they “several condemned” those responsible and underlined the cooperation of the Church with the tribunals of the state.

By the end of 1936, the severe measures taken by the German bishops in reaction to these very few cases, some of which were doubtful, seemed to have resolved the real problems. Quietly, the bishops also pointed out that among teachers in the state schools and in the very youth organization of the regime, the Hitler Youth, the cases of condemnations for sexual abuses were much more numerous than among the Catholic clergy.

It was the anti-Nazi encyclical of Pius XI that led to the great campaign of 1937. Mariaux proved it publishing highly detailed instructions sent by Goebbels to the Gestapo, the political police of the Third Reich, and above all to journalists, just a few days after the publication of Mit brennender Sorge, inviting them to “reopen” the cases from 1936 and also older cases, constantly recalling them to public opinion. Goebbels also ordered the Gestapo to find witnesses willing to accuse a certain number of priests, threatening them with immediate arrest if they didn’t collaborate, even if they were children.

The proverbial phrase “there’s a judge in Berlin,” which in German tradition indicates trust in the independence of the court system from the political power of the moment, applied – within certain limits – even in the Third Reich. Of the 325 priests and religious arrested after the encyclical, only 21 were condemned, and it’s all but certain that among them some were falsely accused. Virtually all of them ended up in extermination camps, where many died.

The effort to discredit the Catholic Church on an international scale through accusations of immorality and pedophilia among priests, however, did not succeed.

Thanks to the courage of Canaris and his friends, and to the persistence of the Jesuit detective Mariaux, the truth was already out during the war. The perfidy of the campaign of Goebbels aroused more indignation than the eventual guilt of some religious. The father of all moral panics in the area of pedophile priests blew up in the hands of the Nazi propagandists who had tried to organize it.

Massimo Introvigne is an Italian sociologist of religion. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR). This is a translation of his article in the Italian newspaper L’Avvenire (April 16). Reprinted with permission.